Radeon 660M vs Intel Arc A750

Limited
Radeon 660M Buy Now ↗
VS
Available
Intel Arc A750 Buy Now ↗
Share this comparison: Copied!

Review

Radeon 660M
Intel Arc A750
Gaming
7
31
Workstation
13
38
AI/ML
7
27
Energy Efficiency
88
43
Quick Comparison Final Score
22
33
❖

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages between Radeon 660M and Intel Arc A750

Reasons to consider the Radeon 660M

  • + RDNA 2.0 architecture
  • + Rembrandt codename
  • + System Shared memory
  • + PCIe 4.0 x8 interface

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750

  • + Generation 12.7 architecture
  • + DG2-512 codename
  • + 8GB GDDR6 memory
  • + PCIe 4.0 x16 interface

Pros & Cons

Radeon 660M
  • Great energy efficiency
  • Hardware ray tracing support
  • No discrete card needed — integrated solution
  • Limited gaming performance at higher resolutions

"A budget AMD Radeon 660M integrated graphics with limited performance overall, excellent energy efficiency. Suited for casual gaming and basic graphics tasks."

Intel Arc A750
  • Hardware ray tracing support
  • Dedicated AI tensor cores
  • Limited gaming performance at higher resolutions
  • No DLSS upscaling support

"A entry-level Intel Arc A750 graphics card with modest workstation performance (38/100). Suited for casual gaming and basic graphics tasks."

Gaming Performance

Forza Horizon 5

1080p High
12
68
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750

The Witcher 3

1080p High
10
114
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
20
108
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750

Far Cry 6

1080p High
19
87
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750

Hogwarts Legacy

1080p High
50
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750

Call of Duty

1080p High
15
69
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750

Ghost of Tsushima

1080p High
9
51
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750

Cyberpunk 2077

1080p High
9
69
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750

Tomb Raider

1080p High
13
98
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750
FPS Table
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750
1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra 1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Forza Horizon 5 12 — — — 68 — — —
The Witcher 3 10 — — — 114 — — —
Counter-Strike 2 20 — — — 108 — — —
Far Cry 6 19 — — — 87 — — —
Hogwarts Legacy — — — — 50 — — —
Call of Duty 15 — — — 69 — — —
Ghost of Tsushima 9 — — — 51 — — —
Cyberpunk 2077 9 — — — 69 — — —
Tomb Raider 13 — — — 98 — — —
Average FPS 12——— 79———
Average FPS by Resolution
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750
1080p High 17 98
1080p Ultra 13 79
1440p Ultra 9 59
4K Ultra - 33
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Radeon 660M
1344
Intel Arc A750 +707%
10846
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750
Time Spy 1515 12425
Solar Bay 6396 45771
Port Royal 586 6594
Fire Strike 4870 30444
Wild Life Extreme 2676 23682
Night Raid 19259 110785
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
Radeon 660M
3207
Intel Arc A750 +294%
12620
Radeon 660M Intel Arc A750
G2D Mark 645 737
DirectX 11 54 FPS 73 FPS
DirectX 12 27 FPS 70 FPS
GPU Compute 1418 Ops/s 5307 Ops/s
Blender
Blender GPU
Radeon 660M
92.56
Intel Arc A750 +2097%
2033.41

Specifications

GeekBench 6 OpenCL
Specification Radeon 660M ↗ Intel Arc A750 ↗
GB6 Compute Score 14065 99280
Background Blur 36 img/sec 145.2 img/sec
Face Detection 16.4 img/sec 82 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.48 Gpixels/sec 3.35 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.65 Gpixels/sec 5.01 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.53 Gpixels/sec 7.59 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.81 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 46.5 Gpixels/sec 462.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2056.5 FPS 18623.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
GeekBench 6 ML
Specification Radeon 660M ↗ Intel Arc A750 ↗
GB6 ML Single Precision 3903 12178
GB6 ML Half Precision 4745 12796
GB6 ML Quantized 2977 9086
Image Classification (SP) 1465 5475
Image Segmentation (HP) 1706 13781
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4266 11612
Face Detection (HP) 5115 18556
Pose Estimation (Q) 12992 58801
Text Classification (SP) 1116 824
Machine Translation (HP) 1859 2397
Object Detection (SP) 1574 6895
Depth Estimation (Q) 6538 22219
Style Transfer (SP) 26656 161148
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
General
Specification Radeon 660M ↗ Intel Arc A750 ↗
Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Discrete
Released 1-Jan-22 12-Oct-23
Case Laptop Desktop
Purpose Generic Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 12.7
GPU Codename Rembrandt DG2-512
Recommended CPU -AMD Ryzen 5 6600Hor above -Intel Core i5 12500or above
Graphics Processing Unit
Specification Radeon 660M ↗ Intel Arc A750 ↗
Base Clock 400 MHz 2050 MHz
Boost Clock 1800-1900 MHz (configurable) 2400 MHz
Shading Units 384 3584
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 24 224
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 112
Compute Units (Pipelines) 6
Tensor Cores 448
Ray-tracing Cores 6 28
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1024KB shared 16MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC
Raw Performance
Specification Radeon 660M ↗ Intel Arc A750 ↗
Pixel Fill Rate 29-30 GPixel/s 269 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 43-46 GTexel/s 538 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32) 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS 17.2 TFLOPS
Physical
Specification Radeon 660M ↗ Intel Arc A750 ↗
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 15 W 225 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 6 nm 6 nm
Die Size 208 mm² 406 mm²
Transistor Count 13.1 billion 21 billion
Transistor Density 62.98 MTr/mm² 51.72 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature
Memory
Specification Radeon 660M ↗ Intel Arc A750 ↗
Memory Type System Shared GDDR6
API
Specification Radeon 660M ↗ Intel Arc A750 ↗
DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2 3
CUDA
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2

Comparison with Competitors

About QuickComparison

×

QuickComparison is your premier destination for tech comparisons and rankings. We help consumers make informed decisions by providing detailed comparisons of processors, smartphones, laptops, GPUs, and other tech products.

Our team of tech enthusiasts carefully analyzes and compares products across various categories to bring you the most accurate and up-to-date information.

Whether you're building a PC, buying a new phone, or choosing a laptop, QuickComparison gives you the data you need to make the right choice.

For inquiries, please contact us at: contact@quickcomparisons.net

Contact Us

×

Have questions, suggestions, or feedback? We'd love to hear from you!

Email: contact@quickcomparisons.net

We strive to respond to all inquiries within 24-48 hours.

Terms of Use

×

By accessing and using QuickComparison.net, you accept and agree to be bound by the terms and provisions of this agreement.

Use License: Permission is granted to temporarily access the materials on QuickComparison's website for personal, non-commercial transitory viewing only.

Disclaimer: The materials on QuickComparison's website are provided on an 'as is' basis. QuickComparison makes no warranties, expressed or implied, and hereby disclaims and negates all other warranties including, without limitation, implied warranties or conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement of intellectual property or other violation of rights.

Limitations: In no event shall QuickComparison or its suppliers be liable for any damages (including, without limitation, damages for loss of data or profit, or due to business interruption) arising out of the use or inability to use the materials on QuickComparison's website.

Accuracy of materials: The materials appearing on QuickComparison's website could include technical, typographical, or photographic errors. QuickComparison does not warrant that any of the materials on its website are accurate, complete or current.

Governing Law: These terms and conditions are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in that location.

Scroll to Top